From:	Fetterman, Pat [Glen.Fetterman@Infineum.com]
Sent:	Wednesday, December 15, 2004 5:08 PM
To:	Bill Buscher (E-mail); Bill Larch (E-mail); Campbell, Bob; Cathy Devlin; charlie.passut@aftonchemical.com; Dan Pridemore; Dick Patrick (E-mail); Glen Fetterman; greg.shank@volvo.com; James Gutzwiller; James Matasic (E-mail); Jeff Clark; Jim McGeehan; Jim Moritz (E-mail); Jim Rutherford; Jim Wells (E-mail); Joe Franklin; John Heagelin; Keith Selby; kenneth.goshorn@volvo.com; Mark Cooper; Matt Urbanak (E-mail); Michael Minotti; Mike Zaiontz (E-mail); Norbert Nann (E-mail); Riccardo Conti; Ron Buck; Scott Harold; Scott Richards (E-mail); Stacy Bond; Steve Kennedy; Tom Boschert (E-mail); Tom Franklin; Warren Totten (E-mail); Wim Van Dam
Subject:	Unconfirmed minutes of the December 15 Mack Surveillance Panel teleconference
Team,
Here are the unconfirmed minutes of our just completed teleconference-
Meeting called to order at 2:12 pm by Jeff Clark acting for Wim Van Dam, the Panel Chair.
1) Attendance: Bob Campbell ; Pat Fetterman ; Greg Shank ; Jim Matasic ; Jeff Clark ; Jim Moritz ; Jim Rutherford ; John Heagelin ; Ken Goshorn ; Riccardo Conti ; Ron Buck ; Scott Richards ; Steve Kennedy ; Tom Franklin ; Andy Broff
2) No membership changes reported.
3) Scott Richards moved and Bob Campbell seconded that a new T-8 stand in an experienced lab can be calibrated with one test if that test is run within one year of the last calibration test. Following significant discussion, clarification and comment, Scott withdrew his initial motion and revised it to:
A new T-8 stand in a lab which has run at least four successful T-8 calibration tests can be calibrated by meeting a reduced K value of 1.43 if the new stand calibration is started within 18 months of the last succseeful calibration test in that lab, with an effective date of December 15, 2004. The revised motion was seconded by Greg Shank, and it passed with (9) yes, (0) no and (1) waive.
4) Once again, following significant discussion, Tom Franklin moved that the Mack Panel will support the use of dyed fuel in all tests currently using either LSRD-4 or PC-9 low sulfur fuel. Pat Fetterman seconded the motion, and it also passed with (9) yes, (0) no and (1) waive.
5) Old business - Greg Shank noted that he had sent an analysis of the bearings from the most recent T-10 testing to both Jeff Clark and Pat Fetterman and he asked that this report be circulated to the group for discussion at our meeting in San Antonio on January 12, 2005. (Sent, GPF) The report indicated that Dana could find no reason for the changes seen in used oil lead with these bearings. 
6) New Business - Pat Fetterman moved and Scott Richards seconded that the fuel for the Mack T-8 test should be changed to the PC-9 low sulfur fuel (undyed, at least for now). This motion also passed with (9) yes, (0) no and (1) waive.
Our next meeting will be on January 12, 2005 at the PerkinElmer facility in San Antonio, TX.
The meeting was adjourned at 3:09 pm.
Respectfully submitted,
Pat

Pat Fetterman
Industry Liaison Advisor
Infineum USA L.P.
Ph - (908) 474-3099
Fx - (908) 474-3363
e-mail pat.fetterman@infineum.com