From:	Fetterman, Pat [Glen.Fetterman@Infineum.com]
Sent:	Tuesday, August 19, 2008 12:00 PM
To:	a.budd@isp-institute.com; Bill Buscher (E-mail); Bill Larch; Campbell, Bob; Cathy Devlin; charlie.passut@aftonchemical.com; Dan Pridemore; Dick Patrick (E-mail); Glen Fetterman; Greg Miiller; greg.shank@volvo.com; Hind Abi-Akar; James Gutzwiller; James Matasic (E-mail); Jeff Clark; Jesse Hamilton; Jim McGeehan; jim.moritz@intertek.com; Jim Rutherford; joe.franklin@intertek.com; John Haegelin; Keith Selby; kenneth.goshorn@volvo.com; Mark Cooper; Matt Urbanak (E-mail); Melissa Lovesky; Michael Minotti; Norbert Nann (E-mail); Riccardo Conti; Ron Buck; scott cobbs; Scott Harold; Scott Richards (E-mail); Steve Kennedy; Victor Kersey; Wim Van Dam
Subject:	Unapproved minutes of our August 6, 2008 telecon.
Meeting attendees -
Jeff Clark; Bob Campbell; Jim Rutherford; Riccardo Conti; Jim Moritz; Ben Webber; Mark Cooper; Ron Buck; Kevin Carabell; Jim Matasic; Jess Hamilton; Greg Shank; Pat Fetterman
 
Minutes -
Mark Cooper noted that SwRI had redefined their T-12 reference run as operationally valid based on our recent discussions of a potential severity shift from new rings.

Following several minutes of discussion, a motion was made by Pat F. with a second by Bob C.:
Declare reference attempts with new rings as pending and temporarily freeze SA's until the severity of the new ring batch is better quantified. New SA's will apply after five reference results are in-hand. The motion carried with (9) positive (0) negative (1) waive.

Update on possible additional reference tests -
Jim Matasic - LZ test is "a little ways off" No solid date, but possibly in a couple of weeks.
Greg Shank - ISP is on hoilday, possible decision in two weeks upon their return.
Riccardo Conti - One candidate about to start, will be followed by a reference.
Ben Webber - SwRI is considering running a second reference, but no decision yet.
Jim Moritz - Intertek can't commit to run now, but may reconsider for future.

Ron Buck reported that there are (8) sets of old rings for T-11 and T-12 tests, and (2) sets of T-10 rings.

There was a discussion of how to use the available parts which resulted in two motions:
1) Greg Shank moved and Pat F seconded a motion to not use "old" rings in T-11 calibrations with fresh rebuilds starting on or after August 6, 2008. The motion carried with (8) positive (0) negative (2) waive.
2) Bob C moved and Riccardo C seconded a motion that all future T-12 reference tests should be run with "new" rings and liners in all six holes. The motion again carried with (8) positive (0) negative and (2) waive.

Greg stated that he will try to get some "old" rings sequestered for future use.
Mark C questioned whether we should consider stopping the use of "old" rings for candidate testing, and the question was put "on the table" until out next conference call.

Review of proposed T-12 status letter to Industry -
It was suggested that we should add wording to the effect that the Mack Surveillance Panel will set up a formal plan to implement future changes in "new" critical parts, with a possible trigger being when TEI places an order for these parts. It was also suggested that this activity should be added to the Scope and Objectives of the Panel.
Mark agreed to revise the letter and send it out for a finel review before sending it to the HDEOCP and PAPTG Chairmen.

The next conference call was set for August 20 at 10:30 am EDT.

There was a brief discussion regarding the impact of an early calibration run on a labs calibration status, and there was consensus that Jeff Clark will administer a system which allows the lab(s) to continue to run on their previous calibration until they have reached their time/runs limit or there is a resolution to the current issues - with no net gain or loss of calibration status.

It was also noted that the T-11 calibration run with high oil consumption was with the reference oil, not a candidate. Further discussion of possible action was tabled until our next call.

Respectfully submitted,
Pat